No. 19-8126
Garry Wayne Wilson v. Oklahoma
Response RequestedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: criminal-jurisdiction due-process equal-protection fifth-amendment indian-law state-prosecution treaty-rights tribal-sovereignty
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the State of Oklahoma has jurisdiction to prosecute a Cherokee Indian whose alleged crime of murder occurred within the historic and treaty-set boundaries of the Cherokee Nation
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the State of Oklahoma has jurisdiction to prosecute a Cherokee Indian whose alleged crime of murder occurred within the historic and treaty-set boundaries of the Cherokee Nation. : ;
Docket Entries
2020-11-06
MANDATE ISSUED.
2020-11-06
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2020-10-05
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>McGirt</i> v. <i>Oklahoma</i>, 591 U. S. ___ (2020).
2020-08-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-20
Brief of respondent Oklahoma in opposition filed.
2020-06-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 20, 2020. See Rule 30.1.
2020-06-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 19, 2020 to July 19, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-05-20
Response Requested. (Due June 19, 2020)
2020-05-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.
2020-03-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 27, 2020)
Attorneys
Oklahoma
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Respondent
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Respondent