Whether the Tenth Circuit has jurisdiction to consider denying of plaintiff, prisoner in custody of Department of Corrections, housed in private prison in violation of Bounds v. Smith

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether the Tenth Cent nas durisdichon ty consider Deoying of plamstiF, prisontr in Custody of Depovtinect of Corcectons bonged in private prison in Vivlakon of Bounds y Seth The issue presented to US Distoy Cort He deol of Low Libiay by detendonty in violation of 0.0.0.6 OP 65015 deadln, 48 a prose —plainhh mn a cw) ngs Compleat pursuant’ tr YO WSC. ¢ 493 plainhlf proved by provided documentatun the debiodeaty Law Library Supunir Deniid Nevess once planklf fled Doc Regueck Soff 4 System of communccik ar ty resolve thet dows) Ms Pabluson Write a miscunduct bag on te . . fact hat plaintiff bad Filed corrplanl in £0. CW-1430d JHE SPS By the Dishiet Court Denyrog plontifl qnest for oppodinent’ f Counsel in the present case , oftar Hy defendants shoved retaliatory actor by wititing a discplary muisconducl on plank For pursuct +o obtain aces to court Bovodls y Srmith guarankee” cetalratin would be o frst Arndadweny Violation base on plant Compleind Ghoul prison Condrtions of coninenent” especicl ly when any muscondicl Artién plowklt treastic Arm Mason Setsity defended contione to eeptess, Plamtll shunt have Ween granted Gyppoindinent oF Counsel’ nore ty preset b's cose or he would be without Gay moos +o providl ony 5 upportuly Cast lew, ond investiqale try crucic] Fests complexity viley Footagd in this Ca@ would G ppontinend of course probed plarnti FF right 40 represen pimsolf glecedy esbdolished in Brund. Sort