No. 19-8136
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-1651 appellate-procedure civil-procedure due-process extraordinary-writ federal-courts jurisdictional-claims mandamus parties standing supreme-court-jurisdiction writ-of-mandamus
Key Terms:
DueProcess ClassAction
DueProcess ClassAction
Latest Conference:
2020-05-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the petitioner sufficiently establish the right to have the writ of mandamus granted?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED BY WHAT IS ARGUED WITHIN THIS SUBMISSION. DID THE PETITIONER SUFFICIENTLY ESTABLISH THE RIGHT TO HAVE THE WRIT OF MANDAMUS GRANTED? ~ l-of-38
Docket Entries
2020-06-01
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.
2020-04-16
Waiver of right of respondent South Carolina Department of Corrections to respond filed.
2020-03-10
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 29, 2020)
Attorneys
Lawrence Crawford
Lawrence Crawford — Petitioner
South Carolina Department of Social Services
Daniel R. Settana Jr. — The McKay Firm, P.A., Respondent