No. 19-8140
Benjamin Dennerlein v. Mark Garman, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Rockview, et al.
IFP
Tags: attorney-misconduct client-assault due-process fundamental-fairness ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel post-conviction-relief pre-trial-conduct prejudice strickland-standard strickland-v-washington
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Punishment
HabeasCorpus Punishment
Latest Conference:
2020-05-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does Strickland v. Washington prejudice threshold condone the actions of Counsel when Counsel assaults his client pre-trial, covered up said assault defrauding the Trial Court, thereby creating an extremely hostile environment in which Counsel is incapable of operating within the fundamental fairness of the proceeding where the P.C.R.A. Court acquiesces to Counsel's failure to investigate along with the lack of presentation of valid impeachment evidence?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : |
Docket Entries
2020-06-01
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.
2020-03-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 29, 2020)
Attorneys
Benjamin Dennerlein
Benjamin Dennerlein — Petitioner