Whether Anabella Soury was denied due process in a mortgage foreclosure case

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether Anabella Soury, as 50% interest Mortgage Holder in this Mortgage Foreclosure Case, where the judgment is based on a Residential Home Loan, where Anabella Soury, as an Indispensable Party and her attorney, Robert L. Moore were Never Served with a Final Judgment of Foreclosure or the Amended Final Judgement of Foreclosure by the lower court or by opposing counsel and the time to appeal has long passed, where Anabella Soury was denied the opportunity to be heard. Was this a denial of due process and does this render the judgment of foreclosure void? When the lower court, Judge Michael Hanzman denied Attorney Arthur Morburger to speak in open court and argue the Petitioners brief that he wrote “Defendants Emergency Motion for Relief from Judgment as Void.” Was this a denial of due process and should the judgment of foreclosure be void? When the lower court, Judge Hanzman went on to say, if you file any documents in the future to stop the sale of Robert & Anabella’s home, you will be sanctioned. Is this denial of due process? Should the Third District Court of Appeals ruling of a per curiam order be Quashed for failure to reverse the trial court order from denying relief from the void judgment? : 2