No. 19-8145
Santiago Cruz v. C. Betancourt
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-grievance administrative-remedies civil-rights eighth-amendment exhaustion-of-remedies grievance-process prisoner-litigation procedural-error procedural-errors waiver
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-04-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in finding that the petitioner failed to exhaust administrative remedies for his Eighth Amendment claim
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Me districk court erred in finding Guzfailed+to exhaust adminishative remedies for his Eighth Amendment claim. the district courtfailed to recegnize thed prison officials had waived any procedural errors in: the grievance by deciding the issue onthe merits at all Levels of review. Ferthis reason, this Cast shaild reverse the district Cats decision and decide as 2 matter of law that Cruz did exhaust al} anaity able administrative remedies regarding his Eighth Amendment alaime ; , : % , Y
Docket Entries
2020-04-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2020.
2020-04-03
Waiver of right of respondent C. Betancourt to respond filed.
2019-11-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 29, 2020)
Attorneys
C. Betancourt
Neah Huynh — Office of the Attorney General State of California, Respondent
Neah Huynh — Office of the Attorney General State of California, Respondent