No. 19-8151

Michael John Alcocer Roa v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2020-04-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights counsel-denial criminal-procedure critical-stage due-process interlocutory-appeal right-to-counsel sixth-amendment united-states-v-cronic
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2020-05-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does an interlocutory appeal constitute a critical stage, and does denial of counsel during an interlocutory appeal violate the Sixth Amendment under United States v. Cronic?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Does an interlocutory appeal is a critical stage? If yes, does a denial of counsel during an interlocutory appeal constitutes a violation of Sixth Amendment under United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 659 (1984)? IIt Do pretrial detainees have a constitutional right to get benefit from the prison mailbox rule? : IIt. Does the wire fraud statute (18 USSCC. §1343) apply extraterritorially to extraterritorial violations of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. et seq.)? | |

Docket Entries

2020-05-18
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-04-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-03-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 1, 2020)

Attorneys

Michael Alcocer Roa
Michael John Alcocer Roa — Petitioner
Michael John Alcocer Roa — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent