No. 19-8152
Menes Ankh-El, aka Wendell Brown v. Robert Carter, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: atypical-and-significant-hardship civil-rights due-process hardship-standard law-library-access prison-transfer prisoner-rights procedural-due-process retaliation
Key Terms:
DueProcess FirstAmendment
DueProcess FirstAmendment
Latest Conference:
2020-05-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does Ankh-El's permanent transfer to higher level prison to use the law library impose atypical and significant hardship, deny procedural due process and constitute retaliation?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. Does Ankh-El's permanent transfer to higher level prison to use the law library impose atypical and significant hardship, deny procedural due process and constitute retaliation? II. Does a refusal to transfer Ankh-El, a level 1 prisoner, to the proper level 1 prison until he forfeits or relinquishes use of the law library constitute retaliation and denial of procedural due process? 2 Of 23
Docket Entries
2020-06-01
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.
2020-05-01
Waiver of right of respondent Carter, et al. to respond filed.
2019-11-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 1, 2020)