Whether the lower courts erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims for failure to exhaust administrative remedies when the petitioner was denied the opportunity to fully pursue the administrative process

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 4) Alber reading Hais Unpuldished cane provided ( Rosav. Lites ) ef Sibuakions Q? #2) sha Cock Ending Wnquvy wey compleled Wh Unc, Prnding np’ He licen in Queshon OA OSE VpeesCive Lovee , Whak Cuneo ackion CoA ao Shep-+wo wove Aven we @ , £3) Given Ynok +he \awaoke Lied oa ahepone BLBAS What wowla Ane \nwadke had ween arpealing 10 OY wax velurned only Zdays afte lodang Lead with Mare vesponse Wok The oRce OC euspecte Ceneveck wos Awe an Caveskigakion 2? #4) ZL gn dep-one Wewanee Was RieaA B13A0 and veturned 915410 with he Inveskigak on of Une Fock Lindivg inquiry KW in procesS how COA Mae make comply wily Unt PLE exlrausion of vemedies or appeal an unfinished investigation 4 c) tn Mae appeal Yona Mae Revers a shabea “A wag alovalvary Loy Var Yamatle te to Wave do Comply wits, Ssep-two 15 das do Lile When We Shep-ont Noting & veduvned so Past (2 dans) aber loeigp {led > COMMA Wnt nmete hak ogpealeA Whale weg ehi\\ \ovixg \avests jated > ¥, \ —— . ~ v) THe \oww Comks comA nok decide Me Pee Crhausionr of cremedtog in WES cose Vac inwmete Crew a Step-One Which ook veluraed Zdayg \odev Staking Qun ek ser wes Lota done low Kore og 7 genera| oe «4 Lock. snachinp ney agox opened Had Vac Awmake, Nenown Mook are PUPS voqniemint dened Wnt Lorber when You allowd Mar acy, We Yee Lo ho We tnvisigghion gvel Vat Step hwo would nave Cie Traney » Rak Hrt PLR does viguive Mie mate to let Ur gk wat waked ot 9 UMni* Laucl. So Bew® wow codtd « Commry Wy \ecth vekwwemis