No. 19-8160

Eddie Vincent Rutledge v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2020-04-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: conspiracy constitutional-rights criminal-conspiracy criminal-procedure double-jeopardy fifth-amendment issue-preclusion solicitation
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-04-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Florida trial court violate the Fifth Amendment's guarantee against double jeopardy?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED DID THE FLORIDA TRIAL COURT VIOLATE THE FIFTH AMENDMENT’S GUARANTEE AGAINST DOUBLE JEOPARDY WHEN IT REFUSED TO APPLY THE DOCTRINE OF ISSUE PRECLUSION TO ALLOW FOR EVIDENCE TO BE ADMITTED OF AN ACQUITTED CRIME WHERE PETITIONER WAS CONVICTED OF CONSPIRACY BUT ACQUITTED OF SOLICITATION IN A PRIOR TRIAL AND THE STATE CONCEDED THAT THERE WAS OTHER RECORD EVIDENCE SUGGESTIVE OF THE CONSPIRACY THAT DID NOT INVOLVE EVIDENCE OF THE SOLICITATION? 3

Docket Entries

2020-04-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2020.
2020-04-08
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2020-03-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 4, 2020)

Attorneys

Eddie Vincent Rutledge
Eddie V. Rutledge — Petitioner
Eddie V. Rutledge — Petitioner
Florida
Celia A. Terenzio — Respondent
Celia A. Terenzio — Respondent