No. 19-8181

Arkeem Hakim Jordan v. North Carolina

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-04-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence-disclosure particularity probable-cause prosecutorial-misconduct search-and-seizure speedy-trial
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2020-05-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the search warrant and the resulting constitutionally and sufficiently particularized, and whether the officers were allowed to use their discretion as to what property to seize

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Jssu€ OFC. Wes +he Starch wiarrand aud Wee reuuit Consittuspomnty And suRF ic iewrly Partea bac or Were +hey Bro42 And Allowep the VEFrcers +0 WSE theic . . €@scritiom WS do what propet, fo Seite~ d it P Pe LiLo ts TO RAMA OUT Homes DOC qssue Two. JS the STMTE GFFrcers «4 kent belay Ram properly Announcing Wha tte are and why dtne, Are suere, And withe 7 our homes boors ,wrHuont Hucre berny Huy Enercencty qssuce Three Wins the property Sitroww to the Jury by the Side TH 4urs rsSue tHe Fruit of the Porsrovows ~ Tree, ame avd THIS display Violate Federal Law, ue He cConsseteds aw: a Essuc Fourtwis the Starch warrant AYS AFF 2yut For thc Secor search cons}jpusrtrowally partculin’e ; ane WHS the Search under the Second wurriend Atowes Unoer the Ue teo Stuns Cous¢r tutor, oa . Zasue Frve0O ye Cousdyutiow Allow Ane STHTF To Seite prope NOT WMrSdel tn the Sterch warrant AKn2 AF FId4VT+: ESSUE SIR, WAS THE Wuke County Sheriee Pept. Ailowee to Just make one Knovle OM OUR Poors WIth WO PAUSE TH TMG te Allow deFendunt to come 4o tie door woe b duc Same tre Rin our HOMES Door Witnout Gry toe . toe eon "S derendant tre 40 Come to 3ssue Seven cid tne Forse Seren wiarennt ane EPI dau ee To seize dhe owe -UsS Gar HAwoGur ° a cre Oo COMET rU4 omuce Fl it oer i Listes iv THe INVENtony. 7 Stree AU the property EssuE SghTt, Po THE sate inDreTMmMesy s Nols) Ole CHS 64 1IZ— 115 Comply With the US Constifuten, ArHeae 3, 38 14,27, 23, wns NOs Colina Generah STAT, Wiwa~ WUCAIESY, ISH-FASZ-~TS4, Avis ISH -a55; oo ESSUE NIWE, DO VOrin CHroimmUS Snore Forms indicus COMPl, Win The U-S SHpreme COURTS Katrny 10 JowES V. UNITED SMUTES, 5Z6 U-S143 L-Ed2d 3 € 19974) (bw THAT Jowes . the Supreme COURT Mee Car dust wit clemends Must be Chierard tn due indica mewt , 54 Bune tee do A Tury . And Proved by the Governmen+ Seyone 1 reMsonasie = ape. doubt: ZA S2E4S WE SSS baci TSSUE TEN. dO the LMCK OF PArrrem Writ] fn MY tH dretin ews Eiarl do Insure thigh the defendiqui Will be prosecttic OW duc Facts presensec to due Grane Juv. Ane 1s one OF tue, SArPEGUALES by Which AM MHdictment rs to Tusure that dhe defencund ts prosecute on ane basrs OF Fucrs presented do 4 Grand Jury. Tssue Eltvey, TST wu Federal Aud COUNT UtioWiMe Caw Thwd whe an maictmend Faris Jo Set forty awl eSsenTIac Sleaews OF A Crime ,the Court i has wo Jurisdiction be bry «a defendund Under tat CouvT or ta dretmed ZSSUS Twelve. TS t+ A Cyl Fact tines fo Alow A Prosecutor or dudge to muice 4 Sua seyucat Guess iS to whit WAST the Mme of Ine Grunge Jury atdne rune they Returned ine incichnent would depreve tue dereucunt o8 4 basic Protection thut tee Grane dury was deSiynee io Secure + : TssuE Thectees. DO tue STATE Cour Violate ine defruduu4ts Keousttt uti olin y Protecter Aiquy Fo speedy ~ treat w nen Me Motrons the Cours fo or FOr A Speedy terra , then motino mins for 44 CounT To Dissumirss For Fuarfure jo Prosecafe que ase. ren Fourteen: FS Norte CAvaliuas prosecufors Wad Cour Mliowee to UM COU sh Lula u aity Aud Clearly Altoaed 10 Ont esemical clhenenis From thar Ser Corus nd, ‘ EZ SSUE Fiqutecen. DO 4he Luck oe Fectunc Par bre ul arity en sedtunewts » FROTCTM EMTS ( Shor T Poem) Fail do insure tuud the derauda : ors cArelinas on the Fucts presenteg to tHe Gang Jury. at will ae prosecuted o 2 2 QUESTIONS PRESEOTED | DSsue Sixteer. As th }ue Law under B-6.G-8. & iS(426A). FE due Indetmevt For Sex oFFewmse F4+Ts not necessary oO wallege, Cvevy muder required te be proved ou tte teial. BUt MY 4he Body of tue redretunent, AFTER WAUAIMG dre persew Accused | tue dute oF ofeuse , the county in Whith que Sex OF FErse WAS wlleset!y committee wud dhe averment “Wort Force Wud wens. TSSUue Sevewiecn. Ts te Twdictwre st File No. C312 OG ces LY NHAZ-US Derecacve UBdEO ADP reds vNew Sersey, 530. UWS Hb So. (ze00) , Hud do ik Fully put tne defendant on MOrLE | AS quer % pPreedé Coume7 stareo jt Shaule. ITssucé ery litteen. Te tue wlieges Uictour STATS That some thins Wupperte only orce car tu

Docket Entries

2020-05-26
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.
2020-04-30
Waiver of right of respondent North Carolina to respond filed.
2019-10-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 4, 2020)

Attorneys

Arkeem Jordan
Arkeem Hakim Jordan — Petitioner
Arkeem Hakim Jordan — Petitioner
State of North Carolina
Kimberly Nicole CallahanNorth Carolina Department of Justice, Respondent
Kimberly Nicole CallahanNorth Carolina Department of Justice, Respondent