Whether the presumptive inference under Arizona law for any felony for which the Petitioner was convicted is unconstitutional

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Ouestron # ong Jp the _Natanod ft hartincs 4 impaioonmect Lepooacd pe the “Petition, 0 CR2004023611-00F MT Q “ prcoumptive nfeace Under Aaizona tau jor any ye je hich the, “Patttiones une Convicted ao determined he Aupator Court in ito decnion diominoing the Rule 32 Teitron . bo ot an agqnavected dentence Amponed Puouant Hd A:R.A, 13-604, 1 Aubtoration CF) afta a flbrciag detuminalion Shot the “Parti onas hao previously hetn Convicted 4% ‘talo 6a muse prdionte fHonsss . Buapton + fury . . Jo the “Petitioner's plowing ana lyin 4 tu Baand Jury dadiet, Ment Correct , Ah Retitione, aonet that +e waa depaived 4 dus process 4 daw begin nin; at thy Auando wun fraseding | +n Courity ‘ Aplaineg ty 5 and ea ph anh c pies 4 re bo Lnepp| Lecatle! lege 5 Ad UnCon aticfionaf d 0+ ALR, Y, 13-6o' , /3-Go4.01 13-702, dnd 13-702.0) % all th memkew | the Brand uy. hone lego , dad unconatitational dawo anol . dtatutes Became the “ dreds” 4 the pemies “Poweneu , Hon” She Brand Jay lndictthant that loouad there fom b the manifestation of that!“ Porronoun Mee” And ere mq thet potsdaey Tepe use “ Aut” y the “Panoneds Her