Did the California State Superior Court violate the Petitioner's Due Process, Sixth Amendment, and Eighth Amendment rights

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1] Did the California State Superior Court,Los Angeles County, Compton Branch violate the Petitioner's Due Process,Sixth Amendment Rights,and Eighth Amendant Rights when it violated a Federally Granted Writ of Habeas Corpus in which it was given . . in writing ninety days to release or retry within ninety days but took six hundred and eighty four days to retry the Petitioner with fivehundred ninety four days after the ninety days time limit expired. 2] Did The California State Superior Court,Los Angeles County, Compton Branch violate the Petitioner's Due Process,Sixth Amendment Rights,and Eighth Amendment Rights when it Acted in Excess of its Jurisidiction, Once it violated the ninety day time limit of The Federally Granted Writ of Habeas Corpus. 3] Did the State of California's,County of Los Angeles Prosecutor violate the Petitioners Due Process,Sixth Amendment Rights and Eighth Amendment Rights when she withheld Exculpatory and Impeaching Evidence, Medical Records of the Alleged Victim. 4] Was the Petitioner's Trial Attorney Ineffective in Assistance of Counsel when he failed to fully investigate the Exculpatory and Impeaching Evidence, Medical Records of the Alleged Victim which would have Exonerated the Petitioner and Shown Factual Innocense. 5] Did The California State Superior Court,Compton Branch, The Second Appellant District Court of Appeals, and The California State Supreme Court violate The Petitioner's Due Process Rights, Sixth Amendment Rights and Eighth Amendment Rights when they denied the Petitioner an Evidentiary Hearing on his Writ of . Mandate for F,R,C,P, Rule 60(b) Motion for Brady Violations, : Excess of Innocent Claim, Prosecutorial Misconduct, and Ineffective Assistance of Councel Claims. 6] Did The United States District Court, Central District, California, Los Angeles violate the Petitioners Due Process, Sixth Amendment Rights,and Eighth Amendment Rights when it failed to Maintain Jurisdiction over The Granted Writ of Habeas Corpus that The State Court Violated and Failed to Grant The Petitioner an Evidentiary HWéaring for his F.R.C?P.Rule 60(b) Motion on Factual Innocense, Brady Violations, Excess of Jurisdiction, Prosecutorial Misconduct, and Ineffective Assistance of Councel. 7] Did The United States Court of Appeals for The Ninth Circuit Violate The Petitioners Due Process Rights,Sixth Amendments Rights, and Eighth Amendment Rights when it denied The Petitioner a Certificate of Appealability for an already Granted Certificate of Appealibility from the District Court, Denying The Petitioner: an Evidentiary Hearing on the Brady Violations,Factual Innocense Claim, Excess of Misconduct, and Ineffective Assistance of Councel Claims.