No. 19-8196

Larry Grant Gentry v. Arizona

Lower Court: Arizona
Docketed: 2020-04-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: and whether a court should assess such a strike u batson-challenge Batson-v-Kentucky civil-rights due-process jury-selection objective-observer-test peremptory-challenges peremptory-strike purposeful-discrimination racial-discrimination
Key Terms:
DueProcess Takings
Latest Conference: 2020-05-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a party taints the entire jury selection proceedings by providing a racially discriminatory basis for exercising a peremptory strike at the second step of a challenge made under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether a party taints the entire jury selection proceedings by providing a racially discriminatory basis for exercising a peremptory strike at the second step of a challenge made under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986). 2. Whether a court assessing a challenge to a prosecutor’s use of a peremptory strike should assess the proffered basis for the strike under an objective observer test instead of the purposeful discrimination standard at the third step of a challenge made under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 US. 79 (1986). 2

Docket Entries

2020-05-26
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.
2020-04-29
Waiver of right of respondent Arizona to respond filed.
2020-03-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 7, 2020)

Attorneys

Arizona
Michelle HoganArizona Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Michelle HoganArizona Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Larry Grant
Kevin Dean HeadeMaricopa County Office of the Public Defender, Petitioner
Kevin Dean HeadeMaricopa County Office of the Public Defender, Petitioner