No. 19-8203

Rashan J. Hunt v. Ohio

Lower Court: Ohio
Docketed: 2020-04-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-agreement repeat-offender repeat-violent-offender sentencing sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment
Latest Conference: 2020-06-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was petitioner's plea agreement violated, and his constitutional due process protections violated?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW: WAS PETITIONER’S PLEA AGREEMENT VIOLATED, AND HIS CONSTITUTIONAL DUE PROCESS PROTECTIONS VIOLATED, WHEN THE TRIAL COURT IMPOSED A SENTENCE ‘FOR A REPEAT VIOLENT OFFENDER SPECIFICATION TO WHICH HE NEVER ENTERED A GUILTY PLEA? SECOND QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW: WAS PETITIONER'S CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION AGAINST CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT VIOLATED WHEN THE TRIAL COURT IMPOSED AN AGGREGATE SENTENCE OF 19 YEARS ON THE COUNT 1 OFFENSE OF VOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER? THIRD QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW: WAS PETITIONER DENIED HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL THROUGH THE DEFICIENT PERFORMANCE OF HIS TRIAL COUNSEL?

Docket Entries

2020-06-08
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.
2020-02-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 7, 2020)

Attorneys

Rashan J. Hunt
Rashan Hunt — Petitioner