Whether [Mr. Brunson's] right to discover exculpatory evidence is still enforceable

No question identified. : QvisTIONS PeEsenTED PRETRIAL inf 2009. MR, BauNn son InvoKeo His RIGHT TD In CAMERN ACCESS TO CONFINDEdNAL RicogoS PuesuanT Th PsNNSYivawia Vi @itene 460 US. 34 58/1997), Tre PAE twat Juoss dDEewisio Hrs RIGHT Tre Teiat Gunes Aligitookin pre RIGHT, ANd WE PosTConNICDON HUOGES INCLVOING RESPOADENT Ammons BACREO Die RIGHT wHictt CavSéo THE LIGHY TO Be UNSnifpalenele in StT% Covet, AND So THE QUESNONS ARE ¢ ” x ws 4 whenree [ane, Beumsars] Rigth ro DISCov4a SXCVLPeTORY SyiMiNCE 15 STULL Enfoacengre (Id. at 4) ? oe 2 wienteg He |stats) Covsenmews (SHLC] pas TY OBu6ATON To Tuen OVe SVIOENCE IN ITS POSSESSIon Trtet 1s Bor Faloengle AND marteaial To [me, Bevison$] Gunton PUNISHMENT (Td. at aD) ? 3 wHentsa (me. Bavason) is [smc] ewnnco “Td HAVE THe CO FUE RAIEW G0 BY THE Teial Covet To DéTemine WHEN (T CodtaaS INFoR~ MATION THAT PeoBRBLY WoULD Hav2 CtHan Geo THE OUTCome oF HIS Teal [7] 1 woes... must (ne) Bo Gwen A New Teal (Td acs)? Ss 4, Wittia2 BtSPonbints Aee STILL concnrvnonal Lt] opuUGAT {ed | _ fred w enSvR(s} IN Chmiga InSPecTOA Of [ConFroeDat | EMIDINCE (Z4. at $8 n,1SP List of Paancs 1 Tames Fr Ammons, TR, Séniog QBESiosnt Supyaion CoveT TVOGE a. OF exce oe THe 19th Tuninney 3, William B. West bistevct atroenéey 4. OFEILE OF TE DiSMACT ATTVCNEY of TE Iatk PaosscuTpmat DISHUCT