No. 19-8211
Frederick Banks v. Scooter Braun, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Latest Conference:
2020-05-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the District Court erred in denying Petitioner's request for Habeas Corpus under 28 USC §2241?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED an Whe Par te District Court erred th DSanitling Be days Habeas Corpus Under AF USC £1915)? the ther the Dib rick Comet erred in di LomsSung tre dav) Habeas Corpus feet Per hone alleged Prat Pore wel umbius en2 ntenfhjahena& eStreainé tea FIs, ; nd welade j fem oly snce erveillinee RA) Wderreny (That Ulerromr ond remotely defiver 4 cy F “alle! “Michousire Meer ing Went bp fo Couse one VIRAL Grd Courte te Gober Pen demic by the CHA) am
Docket Entries
2020-05-18
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2020-05-06
Waiver of right of respondent Scooter Braun and Big Machine Records to respond filed.
2020-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-04-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-04-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 7, 2020)
Attorneys
Scooter Braun and Big Machine Records
Christopher Neil Gray — Reed Smith LLP, Respondent
Christopher Neil Gray — Reed Smith LLP, Respondent
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent