Was the search warrant for Mr. Carrier's home and computers relying on a single transaction from four years earlier based upon stale information and lacked probable cause a violation to Mr. Carrier's 4th Amendment rights?

Questions Presented ; ; ; ; 1. WAS THE SEARCH WARRANT FOR MR. CARRIER’S HOME AND . _ COMPUTERS RELYING ON A SINGLE TRANSACTION FROM FOUR YEARS EARLIER BASED UPON STALE INFORMATION AND LACKED PROBABLE CAUSE A VIOLATION TO MR. : : CARRIER’S 4TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS. ; a 2. DID THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN MR. CARRIER’S SECOND © ; TRIAL BY. REFUSING TO INSTRUCT THE JURY REGARDING THE rae i ACQUITTALS IN MR. CARRIER’S FIRST TRIAL CONSITUTE A> VIOLATION OF MR. CARRIER’S 5TH AND 14T! AMENDMENT ; RIGHTS. , . / ; : 3. DIDTHE ADMISSION OF THE 150-PAGE “BEHAVIORAL oo : ANALYSIS” OF “CHILD MOLESTERS” CONSTITUTED A : : oe _ | REVERSIBLE ERROR IN VIOLATION OF MR. CARRIER’S 67 ; AND 14TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS.