No. 19-8228

Kirk Russell Marsh v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-04-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: claims-processing criminal-procedure direct-appeal equitable-tolling federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure judicial-procedure mandatory-claims-processing-rule procedural-error unique-circumstances
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus ClassAction JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-05-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a trial court's violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(j)(1) is subject to redress on direct appeal

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED L Whether a trial court’s violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(j)(1) is subject to redress on direct appeal. I. Whether an untimely criminal appeal occasioned by a trial court’s violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(j)(1) is subject to equitable tolling. Til. Whether atrial court’s violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(j)(1) constitutes unique circumstances under the Court’s case law to warrant an exception to a mandatory claims processing rule.

Docket Entries

2020-05-18
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-04-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-04-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 11, 2020)

Attorneys

Kirk Marsh
James Richard TheuerJames R. Theuer, PLLC, Petitioner
James Richard TheuerJames R. Theuer, PLLC, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent