No. 19-8228
Kirk Russell Marsh v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: claims-processing criminal-procedure direct-appeal equitable-tolling federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure judicial-procedure mandatory-claims-processing-rule procedural-error unique-circumstances
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus ClassAction JusticiabilityDoctri
HabeasCorpus ClassAction JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-05-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a trial court's violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(j)(1) is subject to redress on direct appeal
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED L Whether a trial court’s violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(j)(1) is subject to redress on direct appeal. I. Whether an untimely criminal appeal occasioned by a trial court’s violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(j)(1) is subject to equitable tolling. Til. Whether atrial court’s violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(j)(1) constitutes unique circumstances under the Court’s case law to warrant an exception to a mandatory claims processing rule.
Docket Entries
2020-05-18
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-04-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-04-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 11, 2020)
Attorneys
Kirk Marsh
James Richard Theuer — James R. Theuer, PLLC, Petitioner
James Richard Theuer — James R. Theuer, PLLC, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent