No. 19-823
Susan Pearsall v. Thomas C. Guernsey, DDS
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure consent constitutional-procedure court-intervention due-process judicial-modification legal-consent separation-of-powers settlement-agreement
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-04-17
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether it is unconstitutional for the Court to write, rewrite, modify, or add to a so-called settlement agreement without the consent of the parties it binds
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW IL Whether it is unconstitutional for the Court to write, rewrite, modify, or add to a so-called settlement agreement without the consent of the parties it binds. II. Whether it is unconstitutional for an appellate court, upon review of a trial court's order enforcing a so-called settlement agreement, to not affirm or reverse the so-called settlement agreement as a whole, but to create an alternative version by affirming in part and reversing in part. i . DIRECTLY
Docket Entries
2020-04-20
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-03-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2020-03-20
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-08
Waiver of right of respondent Thomas C. Guernsey DDS. to respond filed.
2019-10-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 30, 2020)
Attorneys
Thomas C. Guernsey DDS.
Paul Robert Bonfiglio — Cincinnati Insurance Company, Respondent
Paul Robert Bonfiglio — Cincinnati Insurance Company, Respondent