What are the issues being raised in the SCOTUS petition for writ of certiorari?

No question identified. : CONFLICTS PRESENTED 5pages — N SS CONFLICTS PRESENTED . ) Although laws and statutes can often have interpretations and use of judicial discretions, the . . conflicts presented within this petition are not particularly of what happened within this case more so as to how the matters had been implemented is the majority of the conflicts presented : for an appeal. The violating manner which some specifics had been enacted, is what had been exhibited to the Appellate Court of Appeals however had obviously been an oversight due to " improficiency of format of a non attorney pro se not of legal profession which also received misappropriated advice from clerk’s office staff of what to file. The points of conflict outlined draw question in regard to discrepancies of exactly what happened, who said what, what had not been said, what had not been done, why motions were negated, what had been granted and why, and what substantiated the Circuit Court judge’s discretionary decisions which did display bias and violations of rights of the parties contributing to the decisions and subsequent outcomes which directly conflict with practices, codes of conduct, codes of procedures and of implementing decisions subject to statutes. ~ Substantial conflicts which explicitly show how an in-court oral motion of the respondent for a “rule 215 on the mom’ had been granted without any substantiating evidence, no evidence presented, nor the obligation of an explanation of Circuit Court judge’s decisions subject to statute. There are violations of uniformity subject to review by the Supreme Court under certiorari . jurisdiction which can be remedied in acceptance, review and an appeal. The United States Supreme Court can correct such violations through use of discretionary jurisdiction to review lower court decisions which severely conflict with laws and or statutes and or how laws and or statutes are upheld in protection of rights subject to statutes honed within each state. Direct, strong partial, weak and or non-genuine conflicts are presented. te BROOK v FOSTER ILLINOIS . . 1 " CONFLICTS PRESENTED ° . This strong-partial conflict involves matters of rights which directly violate rights within the state of \llinois statutes such as right to an attorney in processing an arrest on contempt, indirect civil contempt and or any arrest/contempt matter which can and did lead to other matters which can and did violate due process. The absence of the assigned State’s Attorney on behalf of the state and or petitioner of which the judge knew there had been a State’s Attorney for child support for the petitioner which is to be present for court hearings and or proceedings however the “non-attorney pro se petitioner would not had know protocols for representation which subsequently is how the omission of the State’s Attorney came about in the two matters of the Domestic Relations child support case. For instance, the Department of Human Services filed child support on behalf of the petitioner, the State’s attorney for Child Support has an interest in the matter and is to be notified by the court and present for hearings in all matters of child support. However, the Circuit Court judge which also heard the case in matters of ; ~ parenting-time, informed the parties on a particular court appearance that the case is being heard in regard to parenting-time and not child support that particular day. The State’s Attorney for child support subsequently withdrew from the entire case after the Circuit Court judge stated the matters being heard were not regarding however there had still been unresolved matters of child support which simply were not being heard on that particular court appearance of which both the issues of child support and or parenting time were heard by the same judge. The Circuit Court judge proceeded the duration of the case matters of child support and parenting-time without notifying the State’s Attorney regarding any matters