Why was the writ of possession document not signed by a judge or stamped by the lower courts?

QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW BY THE SUPREME COURTS . » SHERIFF NOT REALIZING WRIT OF DOCUMENT WAS NOT SIGNED 4 We would want to ask why Mr. Vincent Brooks(respondent) would declare the writ of ; d possession document to be a legal continuation of procedure to evict Mr. Adrian ; without a stamped date of the lower courts or a Judge’s Signature? 4 . FALSE DOCUMENTS USED IN WRIT OF POSSESSION ON MAY 15 2018 Why was the document of the supposed writ of possession not signed by a judge or stamped by : the lower courts? ) _ WE HAVE A COURT ORDER FOR AN APPEARANCE & EVICTION ON ONE ) COURT DOCUMENT ; > Should the courts stand in agreement that a court order should have two orders that will contend ) to make this a true court document to be upheld by.the courts on April 20 2018 & May 1° 2018? > THE COURTS SHALL BE MADE AWARE OF A DOUCMENT FOR STOPPING > FORECLOSURE THAT WAS PUT IN EFFECT BEFORE THE APRIL 12 2018 SELL » DATE : ) Was there a document that was contracted with CASA to bring the foreclosure to a later date? » THESE:-CONCERNS WERE LOOKED AT BY THE LOWER COURTS AS IMPORTANT IN THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CASE. How was the important facts involving this case reviewed by the courts? Did the lower courts take the proper initiatives needed to award a decision in the defendants favor? THE PLAINTIFF”S PROPERTY BELONGINGS WERE THROWN OUT & THOWN AWAY BY LEGAL OR ILLEGAL MEANS ; Was there proof of the plaintiff's property thrown out for no reason & thrown away? THE PLAINTIFF ADRIAN WEATHERSPOON LIVED AT THIS RESIDENCE FROM 2008-2018 Should plaintiff living at the following address 3983 Neyland Valley dr for at least 10 years have to deal with extremely difficult living situations such as destruction of property & other concerns? ‘ TO THE U.S. SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS CERTIORARI J To who so ever this may come into view with the concerned responsibility of obligations » involving the public's working and owning privileges. I Adrian Weatherspoon will be into view > acting as the sole representative of myself for this case in which I will bring forward to be ] "observed and decided by the Supreme Court’s of Appeals to be look upon within the court’s > concen. . : On the day of May 15" 2018 Mr Adrian Weatherspoon was illegally evicted form his home | , which he paid at least $120,000 in mortgage finances from 2008-2018 . He worked and paid for every dollar amount that was paid into this mortgage with Regions Bank(4). The evidence that : > was presented in General Sessions Court (1), revealed that the petitioner was put out of his home with illegal documents. This was also presented in Circuit Court. (2)as well but yet the decision : ’ } was set for Mr Adrian Weatherspoon not to give him ownership of his home on Jan 08 2019 in ; » the civil case(3). . ] The petitioner also had a dog that was killed in August 2012 as well, this occurred because . ) their were individuals coming into Mr. Weatherspoon’s home while he slept at night or while ] being at work. The dog was raised inside the home under Mr Weatherspoon’s care. So the dog ) was the protector of the home as well as it was his place to reside. The day after Mr. : Weatherspoon was evicted his items of possession were urinated on and a few days later a lot of ) these items were thrown away because Mr. Weatherspoon didn’t have enough money to get everything away from the residence into another place. Since then Mr. Weatherspoon has been living in his car up to now. . | He the petitioner has also exhausted all of his 401k plan into paying towards this home. I don’t feel like I can ever be given a chance at coming back from these circumstances which have occurred. The only thing that would bring a change in this situation would be that the Supreme Court of Appeals act in Mr Weatherspoon’s behalf by doing what is right by civil law. As he is a citizen in the U. S. by overturning the decision so that he may possess his home as it should be. Pe | In conjunction with these turn of events Mr, Weatherspoo