No. 19-8256
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-conviction criminal-procedure due-process eleventh-circuit insufficient-evidence judicial-review motion-for-acquittal sentencing-errors sufficiency-of-evidence
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-05-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the evidence was insufficient to support Browdy's conviction and his motion for judgment of acquittal should have been granted
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. CERTIORARI REVIEW SHOULD BE GRANTED WHERE THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AFFIRMED BROWDY’S CONVICTIONS WHERE THE EVIDENCE WAS INSUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT BROWDY’S CONVICTION AND THEREFORE, BROWDY’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL SHOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED. Il. CERTIORARI REVIEW SHOULD BE GRANTED WHERE THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AFFIRMED BROWDY’S SENTENCE WHERE THE DISTRICT COURT COMMITTED SENTENCING ERRORS. F
Docket Entries
2020-05-18
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-04-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-04-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 14, 2020)
Attorneys
Jerry Browdy
David Jonathon Joffe — Joffe Law, P.A., Petitioner
David Jonathon Joffe — Joffe Law, P.A., Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent