No. 19-8258
Denver Maxwell Goree, Jr. v. Michigan Parole Board
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: commutation constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection ex-post-facto parole parole-board punishment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess Securities
SocialSecurity DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference:
2020-05-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Petitioner's parole process was unconstitutional
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether Petitioner’s parole process was unconstitutional where (1) the Michigan Parole Board failed to proceed with a recommendation for commutation in violation of Due Process of Law, and Equal protection under the law, and (2) Whether the Parole Board violated clearly established law set forth in the ex post facto clause by implementing new rules and regulations after Petitioner’s prior considerations that caused a significant risk of increase in punishment?
Docket Entries
2020-06-01
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.
2020-04-25
Waiver of right of respondent Michigan Parole Board to respond filed.
2019-12-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 15, 2020)
Attorneys
Michigan Parole Board
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent