No. 19-8265
Jerry Wilson Hartley v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-interpretation damages due-process judicial-review legal-scope procedural-rights qualified-immunity standing state-actor
Latest Conference:
2020-05-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Are the actions of a district court in denying a motion to dismiss a civil rights claim for damages against a state actor constitutional?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Dre THe Fosom Laer Coux of Wale EQVED _ ARE TRE Acces Ais QoL of A Didecr Adleat . DARK WORSE DD TIMEDY, (AimtoST S-Yenes Lom) Wintoo* Gieaans Lee To Guns a Usted Deer AME?
Docket Entries
2020-05-18
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-04-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-03-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 15, 2020)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent