Whether the trial court erred in denying Somes Heard's pre-trial motion to proceed pro se

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Wherner tne ryto\ Court erred in denying, Somes Heard's pre-trial motion -bo PYOleed pro De. 2. Wihather the appellate court unransonately — @pplad the Umbad Stakt#s Supreme Courts holding, In Fayette u California 422 US oR SSS (A545) ip Finding Hoo* My. Heavy al Was not denied nis Consitubhonmal viQnt +o proceed pro se? 3. \Nhather Mr. teovd was denis? ne nel rignt © proceest pro Se in tytel Coury A. wiatney ne appellate Court and the People oF nt . oF Lilinois Iwipvoperly applico the Beez case 95 bS-6%, | 5. Whethey tne trial Court foiled to propevly admonisly . mr.Heavd before denying iw his Constiutiono| right +o proceadl pre Se. (. whether the circuit court rule on Wir. Hearal’s caquest 4o proceed PFO se %