Did the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals by-pass the petitioner's 5th, 6th and 14th Amendment rights by denying his petition for Certificate of Appealability?

No question identified. : FEDERAL QUESTIONS TO BE ASKED Did the 11™ Circuit Court of Appeals by-pass the petitioner’s 5", 6™ and 14% Amendment rights by denying his petition for Certificate of Appealability, considering the following: A) The police admitted that (out of “9000” cases) this case, was the “only” case, . : where-in they (the police) knowingly and willingly falsified the documents in an effort to fulfill some personal agenda. They (the police) encourage us to “Report Suspicious Activity” —-should their enthusiasm wane when the spotlight lands on them? Fundamental Fairness should be the Courts ultimate focus. See Lockhart v Fretwell, 506 U.S. at 369, 113 S.Ct. 838, 122 L.Ed. 2d 180 (1993). B) When separate cases are “not” severed into separate trials --the , _ contaminating effects of spillover (despite the above tampering factor) will still always result in confusion, chaos and disarray. (See Ground Two). Fairness takes precedence over efficiency, convenience and judicial . economy see Dodge v State, 204 So. 2d 490 (4 Dist. 2016) and Lockhart v Fretwell (supra). | C) Failure to honor a plea agreement (just because the law has since changed) is a breach of contract kniowing that, “any law of which inflicts a greater ; punishment then the law at the time of the crime --is a violation of the Ex post factos provision.” See Akins v Snow 922 F. 2d 1558 (11" Circuit 1991). .