Did reasonable jurist debate whether California Penal Code section 206 is Constitutionally void for purported vagueness because it is capable of arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , ; , Did reasonable jurist . debate whether california Penal Code section 206 is Constitutionally void for . purported vagueness because it is capable of arbitrary ae and discriminatory enforcement ? ; , . . ; mo . Did reasonable jurist debate whether the California . _ court of Appeal reasonably reject Petitioner's sufficiency of evidence claim? . _ ; . . 7 Does the declaration and witness statement secured after trial constitute new evidence within the meaning . / _ of Penal Code section 1473(b)(3) ? Did the Superior Court below error in concluding ; that Petitioner was not entitled to habeas corpus relief : pursuant to Penal Code section 1473(b)(3) 2 .