No. 19-8286

Edward Tiger v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2020-04-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: competency criminal-competency criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment jurisdiction jurisdictional-prerequisite
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-06-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a finding that a criminal defendant is presently competent to proceed is a jurisdictional prerequisite to a court's authority to deprive an accused of his life or liberty under the due process clause of the fifth and fourteenth amendments where a question as to the defendant's competency has been raised?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a finding that a criminal defendant is presently competent to proceed is a jurisdictional prerequisite to a court's authority to deprive an accused of his life or liberty under the due process clause of the fifth and fourteenth amendments where a question as to the defendant’s competency has been raised? |

Docket Entries

2020-06-08
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.
2020-05-18
Waiver of right of respondent State of Florida to respond filed.
2020-04-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 18, 2020)

Attorneys

Edward Tiger
Dane Kristofor ChaseChase Law Florida P.A., Petitioner
Dane Kristofor ChaseChase Law Florida P.A., Petitioner
State of Florida
Celia A. Terenzio — Respondent
Celia A. Terenzio — Respondent