No. 19-8295

Clarence B. Jenkins, Jr. v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-04-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process jurisdiction pro-se standing
Latest Conference: 2020-05-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court's denial of pro se litigant's due process rights requires a writ of certiorari from the U.S. Supreme Court

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | WrdAne WE Dibner Cour Vidldbe Pro 88 Denaty LAS, Condskuaktoneh Ridake of the Quali ede) Proeegs Udveh Requires a reed Voy US Supreme Coudk | Wherein Kets OidutkCeud’s esol Lo) Pro Se Meas? SPP Sled Ne TET TAL Repo WK end REC pMMEMDATLOV PENNE US DadnceCouché Peel i. Where Vin Ah, | | Per ake mae “ “erste retord da fn Se, Deemmras oy ee OUTED OF Motion te Fined orgune Gone 4 Oecepiing OeFendosts Brod Geo Se Merion WMA RY TUDE MEWT WAS prey; T Sal Sbggeston bovtel Terry. Wo oten aNeaes Log Chive Wage, QKVivledron oF & Vudge Pa & 1. Coase . QUE PQwersee’ ; Dew exo . OF Ls. Condstohor ORWER Ne” eT fo Qeeephan Anis COMRLAS WT SL on FA ETL of

Docket Entries

2020-05-26
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.
2020-04-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-02-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 18, 2020)

Attorneys

Clarence Jenkins
Clarence B. Jenkins Jr. — Petitioner
Clarence B. Jenkins Jr. — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent