Lazaro Candelaria v. United States
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Whether the First Step Act of U.S. Senate Bill 756 applies to the Petitioner
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) Whether the First Step Act of U.S. Senate Bill 756, applies to the Petitioner, in his Title 21 U.S.C. § 2255(£)(1) motion. 2) Whether Counsel was ineffective for failing to object to Petitioner's prior convictions as too remote in time to be considered at sentencing. 3) Whether Counsel was ineffective for not requesting Petitioner's Shepard v. . United States 544 U.S. 13, 26 (2005), Shepard documentation, and whether the government prejudiced Petitioner for not producing these documents at Petitioner's original sentencing in violation of Canty v. United States 570 . F.3d 1251 (1ith Cir. 2009). . 4) Whether Counsel was ineffective for not challenging Petitioner's prior ; ; convictions to the lower courts. : 5) Whether Counsel was ineffective for Promising the Petitioner a 60 month sentence, but when Petitioner was sentenced, he received 13 years. ina ; federal prison, based on Counsel's breach of plea. Whether Petitioner's . plea was involuntary, unintelligent and unknowing. :