Whether the Federal Circuit's reliance on prior licenses to ascertain infringement damages, without satisfying apportionment rules, conflicts with this Court's precedent requiring apportionment

question presented is whether the Federal Circuit’s reliance on prior licenses to ascertain infringement damages, without satisfying apportionment rules, conflicts with this Court’s precedent requiring apportionment “in every case.” Garretson v. Clark, 111 U.S. 120, 121 (1884). 2. The Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) may invalidate patent claims after issuing them. This Court has held that when patent claims are invalidated, the invalidation applies in pending litigation. The question presented is whether intervening PTO invalidations apply in all pending cases, including appeals that remain pending at the rehearing or certiorari stage.