Is it reasonably debatable that Qais Hussein was deprived the effective assistance of counsel where his defense attorney failed to object to any insinuation that the plea agreement stipulated to a loss amount and failed to object to the government's failure to recommend a reduction of three levels for acceptance of responsibility?

Question Presented | , . Is it reasonably debatable that Qais Hussein was deprived the effective assistance of counsel where his defense attorney failed to object to any insinuation that the plea agreement stipulated to , . a loss amount and failed to object to the government's failure to : recommend a reduction of three levels for acceptance of responsibility? . . ; -1 7 . ee . we r a PARTIES TO THE. PROCEEDINGS BELOW . . ST : Petitioner, who was the Appellant seeking the Certificate of Appealability in order to appeal the denial of a § 2255 motion, is Qais Hussein. ; Respondent, who was the Appellee in the proceedings below, is the United States of America. -2 se