When a Brady violation (Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)) occurs, must the Court take into account the effects of the Brady violation, or simply evaluate the sufficiency or strength of the evidence, when deciding materiality?

When did compound voir dire questions that allow jurors to self-determine their ability to be fair and impartial become improper?

What is the proper materiality analysis to be used when the State shifts the burden of proof to the defendant during closing argument?

When a Confrontation Clause violation occurs, is it necessary for a defendant to prove that the proper witness was not available?

When a Brady violation (Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)) occurs, must the Court take into account the effects of the Brady violation, or simply evaluate the sufficiency or strength of the evidence, when deciding materiality?