No. 19-8338
Charles P. Mayeux, Jr. v. Louisiana
Tags: constitutional-amendments criminal-conviction criminal-procedure due-process evidence-sufficiency fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment jackson-v-virginia jury-trial non-unanimous-verdict sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess Patent
DueProcess Patent
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a conviction based upon a non-unanimous verdict violates the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a conviction based upon a non-unanimous verdict violates the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution? Whether the sufficiency of the evidence analysis adopted by the Louisiana courts fails to comply with the Jackson v. Virginia due process standard? ii
Docket Entries
2020-11-06
MANDATE ISSUED.
2020-11-06
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2020-10-05
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>Ramos</i> v. <i>Louisiana</i>, 590 U. S. ___ (2020).
2020-09-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-24
Brief in response of respondent Louisiana filed.
2020-06-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 24, 2020.
2020-06-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 25, 2020 to August 24, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-05-26
Response Requested. (Due June 25, 2020)
2020-05-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.
2020-05-14
Waiver of right of respondent Louisiana to respond filed.
2020-04-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 22, 2020)
Attorneys
Charles Mayeux
G. Ben Cohen — The Promise of Justice Initiative, Petitioner
G. Ben Cohen — The Promise of Justice Initiative, Petitioner
Louisiana
Elizabeth Baker Murrill — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Elizabeth Baker Murrill — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent