No. 19-8346

Naeem Jones v. Mark Capozza, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Fayette, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2020-04-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: actual-innocence constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process federal-courts federal-habeas habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance state-prisoner strickland-standard
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-06-25
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a freestanding claim of actual innocence stand a basis of relief for a state prisoner in the context of a federal habeas proceeding?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Question(s) Presented . 1. Does a freestanding claim of actual innocence stand a basis of relief for a state prisoner in the context of a federal habeas proceeding? © 2. Does the first prong of Strickland v. Washington, . 466 U.S. 688 (U.S. 1984) permit a reviewing court to create hypothetical reasons counsel may have had for his/her actions or inactions without first conducting a : hearing. 3. Did not the District Court incorrectly apply this Court’s ruling in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694 (U.S. 1984) where it found that trial counsel was not ineffective when he failed to interview : . witness Charles Waters concerning the misconduct of Detective Ronald Dove.

Docket Entries

2020-06-29
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2020.
2020-04-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 26, 2020)

Attorneys

Naeem Jones
Naeem Jones — Petitioner
Naeem Jones — Petitioner