Whether the Montana Supreme Court violated the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment by failing to address Louis's claims of mental illness and intellectual disability in his death sentence

No question identified. : ae a. -Quescsois. PeesesTen ed AVDA Noe Moakaoe—Saugceme Uguek Fail be pdlcegs the __. ‘ COmMSTTAUTIOWAL COMONS OF Fermi aut To DOOKESS TIRE CousTETOT EOIN QUEST SOAS) DRO LOWS CK TRE CASE “Su Eos ENTERTTY a e BE Dssmsen? ae --B)_Did Ve Monkanc Sugceme _Couck violabe Wee Sudkerh | Cont oF ETC Ss Bc Fac LG ro AdbaeSS Lout's Fumas LE AEETAL SUS GUAT OE ADDRESSING “THE BRAS, ORE UNE CES) AQ tr OSM ao od Bc oe. RAN ALE. Coun ELeeteg 0 a Oreicsas; Qoacecsy Lancson cod WaanEs) Cour derreedey PORES EALS CM aura, Coan, FUL BEECHT) Nalo THE EMV EST SGATEG te [ORES CER _C crcinns, dotnsal, SQUSAES, LeeTe, dowscn siwolee ce LMM EROS “TELL EGAL MerauarreS* Uasck Sisl ELErTED oe LORETO SALS NEA REMSOSAI SawotnED Wari Lowe? ee B.D i Te Noe Mookomc. Supreme Causk Ech ro astess. Norse LAOS LEO SES MESS ANd EROKORATE Uained “Suadcecnr Aatxee an Aoassascxsat mss" Quoc sah StucT UAL D