No. 19-836
Paul Ross Evans v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure federal-rules-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure habeas-corpus judicial-review post-conviction-relief prisoner-petition section-2255 statutory-interpretation successive-application successive-petitions
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a subsequent amendment to a prisoner's first 28 U.S.C. 2255 proceeding may be considered a second or successive application under 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(8)(A) when the initial 2255 proceeding was granted under Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 60(b)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. When a motion under Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 60(b) is granted with respect to a prisoner’s first application under 28 U.S.C. 2255, whether a subsequent amendment to that same proceeding under section 2255 may potentially be questioned in view of 28. U.S.C. 2244(b)(8)(A) as being a second or successive application?
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-12-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 30, 2020)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent