Does the elements clause of 18 U.S.C. 924(c) convictions support 'use of violence' physical force?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | Joes F924 Le) vlorwsebrn support assault wiih a | dungtrwns weefon th aid of racketeering unde 19 USC 19S4L4)C3).2 DoeS the elements clause of w | $Q.U) Uonvitwans Support “ure of Violence” Physical force J Mn are the 79240) and 19 ~ 4 U.S.C 1984 Co3L3) Contrary te the above statutes / Was Counsel, We Fhoctve for fol\ tow to tnuesttygate altos witness? Was counsel taetechvre Gr fot} fag do Ze F potion +7 supprss evidence SelacdS from a wavrombless searth F Was the srdfitrce t prejuclte sa | 2 Was defiudant due process Violakd by police use of L%S preg shot as Phota Jae ue? Was He Worm | bupported by Probable Cause. SF nod 57g nel by atourntf 1 Does M-L.L. 750-82 support irime of violence Under i Burr¥s Wrz 3d 3eb (6db bf, 20/4 (en banc) i } i i