Bobby Ray Knight v. Monterey County, California
Arbitration
Whether the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6(a) and 6(b) are too restrictive or inflexible when resolving impediments to timely litigation, and whether timely extensions to file briefs should be available for litigants hampered by the substantive disabilities of (1) material health issues, (2) medical health crises, and (3) incarceration
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Ane rue Feverai feules of Qul Auoceoure 4 FRAC ) 700 RESTINCTIVE OR INFLEXIBLE WW RESOLVING NNpEDiImEVTS To Tiel y ZIPGnrion, Avo rimely BXTEVSIOUS To FILE BRIEFS, Foe 71406e LPIGAVTS AAMYpBRED BY THE CoV suUnKCriVE ONAGILIFIES OF O) mawrat H6aren O1soevees, (2) meoied HEMLTH. CHISES, Arvo (3) jwenecEkanon, Specirically recaeoiue FAP 31-22 Cb) ; (a) Meerwea Time Scnenvle Oeoses; or . (b) Seeking xreusionlt of Time for Kiiliweg Otiers; WITH PIOTHIVG AVAILABLE LEGON , (c) Ssekie Exrensiows oF Time ter Filing BRIEFS . . mw Exreaoroiarky CirComsTrAVess. rr ‘eno Wi