Whether the trial court's repeated displays of bias, hostility, and animosity toward Herbert Burgess violated the standard for prejudice and bias

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . . DL. Werner THegTrac Couer DEmMEn Heeserr Burgess HIS COMST HT UTION AL RIGHT 70 PEESENT A LOMPLETE Degen se. | QD Wienise nte perme Gouer HAY AUTHOR IZATIOPS TO PRESIDE Ar 4 FELouy TRIAL IN VioLarion OF T12 1at018 SUPREME Comer Ruse R95, Nore 4. TT, wheter THe TRIM Couer’s REPEC ATED DISPIAYS OF Bias, Host ry, ANIMOSITY Ter Wier TowaARry Here BERT BURGESS Vinzaren THe Stawdaey FOR PRETuvice And Biss, : , | ’ TW. WHerHee THe TRL Court's ABSEME FRom, THE Courerevom Wine Te . | Mued Was sme IMPANELED AND THe uer was sy SESSlon WAS go >) STAUATURAL ERROR THar CAuNoT Be Hnemees.. a ; DL. wiettee Hee Bear BURGESS WAS DEMED A Faiz tRigg Duero az PR UAS iE | FRatreen OF PROSEQUTORIAg MM ISees ducer L WT. Wierten He Tre Courr Eeger WHeee pp AMCWwED THE Soave py RE Haraic Tare THe CRED BIL ITy OF THO CRue ip, WIMESSES Ww sri _PRiok CONSISTENT. Strrements 63 Hen THERE WAS No tHawee pe Retewp FABRtGgn ont, : 7 : Hee Heermeer . wa. WHeTHe: + Buegess WAs DEN ad "FAR seurenesue HERRING, THE COuner — ; WHere ConsipEeren An AGGRAVATING, FARR THar wpe DiRecrry CONTRADICTED BY we EVIDERGE.