No. 19-8382
Christopher Ewing, aka Alex Christopher Ewing v. Nevada
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process extradition extradition-hearing fourteenth-amendment indigent-defendant right-to-counsel sixth-amendment statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-05-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act's guarantee of the right to 'demand and procure counsel' requires state courts to appoint counsel for indigent defendants at extradition hearings
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act’s guarantee that defendants have the right to “demand and procure counsel” requires state courts to appoint counsel for indigent defendants at extradition hearings where refusal to do so would violate the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States? @
Docket Entries
2020-06-01
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.
2020-05-04
Waiver of right of respondent Nevada to respond filed.
2020-04-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 1, 2020)
Attorneys
Christopher Ewing, aka Alex Christopher Ewing
Jeffrey T. Green — Sidley Austin, Petitioner
Jeffrey T. Green — Sidley Austin, Petitioner