May the Court of Chimie Appeals of Fougs tin consbtutsena lly deny actually anocent Petitioners motion Por leave to Pile original applicatisa For weit of habeas corpus under levas and US,Constitufiens ?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Hf May the Court of Chimie Appeals of Fougs tin consbtutsena lly deny actually anocent Petitioners motion Por leave to Pile original applicatisa For weit of habeas corpus under levas and US,Constitufiens ? Nn 422, May Texas Continue to opercte Uunconstitutionel ine fPective Pub lec Defendeo/ ~ Court Appointed Defense Couasel system Pye indigent crimmel detendente ? 5 3, M Il 50 states coatinue to epecate uacens titutioae! metpective Public g * * Tey der Court Ageorated Detense Counsel systems for radig ent erveniaal detendeate® 8 5 3S 4u, May Texas and most other states continue FO tin Fliet routine punitive ey = 3 Las Ox cesmive bail on tidigeat actualy innoceat criminel defendoats¢ ' < ee = gx #5. May this US, SUPREME COURT vacate the uncenst: tutioael May be ty opmiea 2 “S = = Ey fn Ex Paste Foaaks, 71 Sw. 3 d 327-331 Tex Cam. Pe 23 3 ss “utionel disseating opiniea in Same ? aS dg const fate! coring & d ith Kat easy * re aed HG. whea Nate Court Officer Appouted Defense Counsel Stabbed defen or powron 2 5 N g oy bined with Trvol Tudge lnmed cately with eat legit (mate Fe ‘ = £2 SS Com oe Tk 0 tes i +, theee Consecutive Frals Is, ~~ eo ia zs shackled defendant visible to yurons 1% Ament Bth Amend violatiba ? ae $= a Paes such inflictiea of cruel oad unusual punenm , a3 SB S ‘ uc! ‘ di'ptustance NAG 3 § #7 Abter said couasel admetted taitrating (ct eating courtroom hold hearing + a § 6 As ‘ ‘ hould trial court remove him or Soe 4. ~~ Should he withdraw et she 13 show thot defendant cheuld not 8 Ee © 3 with Sworn festimony which wou ° 5 3 8 a = be shackled @ Jat tovels oppoiting teak a ' 4 Ul nial s appowfre 2 Se him te file state direct reviews appeal; appeia ‘GF i hacklod defiadanl? 3 wXe SS d state direct feview appeel and utconstituted a7 © a x s a “Sy ane diceve ten by ¥ ing detendoat fe choose bef ween g NaN 3 #F Dill Court abuse ofsese Ton by tere i I) af Dad trial ? Saas 3 Sa. Kafe weilding Counsel of defending himse “ ; 4 g . + Ss ‘ ‘ ‘ s couase Q . £ ay #10. Combined with presecuteasa | misconduct shoul. ; ar ; ou ; “J & 2 28 Pa required to file in the State divect Peyiew “fer i IP cohen hés s x 3 3 § effective assrotaace of counsel agarart mre w " ys ae 8 his ft performonce was obviously iateation ally Plagtaat fer The ub? = cP 3 deficient Pe tho fur to convict wth maine punch om } a = Spectre purpose ot causing THe J Y 3 a. # [1 When the ealy evidence Causing convictisa ts perjuted testimony recanted ee o underoath in Yad tral may the State cenceal aad withheld thes > st tral teaacenphs te Keep thir Potifioner wrong fully rm pris oaed ; = ; = e 3 412, May the State Court wolate Crh Amend. by mowing the trials (change ef venue) x fo other distaicte along with the Lame biased tral judge * presiding af bach foiel aad with Lame prosecutor and ; katte weildiag defeace counsel at each toval § / 413, May prison AfPitials continue to destroy of routmely delay and fad! to mer this pto 8 radigent prvoner® petYisar ia a timely manner to etate, and federal county ina Nate cheated impediment to prevent filing ¢