No. 19-8388
Terrence Jamal Williams v. Sherry L. Burt, Warden
IFP
Tags: constitutional-error courtroom-closure due-process fundamental-fairness fundamental-unfairness ineffective-assistance-counsel ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-discretion sixth-amendment waiver-doctrine weaver-v-massachusetts
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether counsel's failure to object to the closure of the courtroom because he did not want to draw attention to his conduct meets the Weaver v Massachusetts, 137 S Ct 1899 (2017), fundamentally unfair standard?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether counsel’s failure to object to the closure of the courtroom because he did not want to draw attention to his conduct meets the Weaver v Massachusetts, 137 S Ct 1899 (2017), fundamentally unfair standard? Petitioner says “YES” Respondent says “NO”
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-04-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2020)