Whether North Carolina's criminal conspiracy law and federal constitutional law of due process require proof of an overt act, as held in Cole v. Arkansas, 333 U.S. 196 (1948)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . . De Whethets amden North Corotina, and /et federal emstitational Low and principles of Au process, 2 change ef cuninal conspiiney, nequiness TE. anden this counst’s holding sn Cole +, Ankansaw, 333 U.94196 (1948), whore the Court lope the question wnansascred : Ss tt constititional, . pute ty 2 peuon for an uncharged offense at atuab af ‘mere than one charge 2ven ib the yur neturnssea formal . cmt, $e knwledge that @ crime is bang — ors aboutte be eommittad, on clement of drug-narcetie, helated offenses, Ww $6 adwlendant dened, procedural and/or subsiantore emaerisly negusests conbiden defendant's elaund} Jactaly | x