No. 19-8399
Reshon Tolliver v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-split criminal-law criminal-statute drug-payment drug-trafficking evidence federal-law money-laundering statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-05-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether mere payment for drugs constitutes sufficient evidence for a conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1956?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. To resolve a circuit split, whether mere payment for drugs constitutes sufficient evidence for a conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1956? i LIST OF ALL
Docket Entries
2020-06-01
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.
2020-05-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-04-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 4, 2020)
Attorneys
Reshon Tolliver
Jarrod James Beck — Law Office of Jarrod J. Beck, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent