No. 19-84

Lawrence Mulligan v. Bruce Jalbert, et ux.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2019-07-16
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights collateral-estoppel due-process full-faith-and-credit state-court-record summary-judgment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the United States Circuit Court of Appeals erred in affirming the granting of summary judgment based on collateral-estoppel without reference to the state-court-record as required by state-law, thereby failing to accord full-faith-and-credit and denying due-process

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED _ Whether the United States Circuit Court of ; ; Appeals erred when it affirmed the granting of Respondents’ Motion for Summary Judgment based exclusively on collateral estoppel, which Motion lacked any . reference to the State Court Record as required by the applicable law of the State of Connecticut, thereby failing to accord Full Faith and Credit to the law of that State, thus denying Petitioner Due Process of Law. : PARTIES TO THE PRECEDINGS BELOW PETITIONER : : e Lawrence R Mulligan was the Defendant in a civil ; action in the Superior Court State of Connecticut, . Judicial District of Waterbury bearing Docket : Number UWY. CV-08-6001044 S; Jalbert v. a Mulligan, 153 Conn. App. 124 (2014); Jalbert v. . Mulligan, 315 Conn. 901 (2014), a Debtor in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding for non-dis; : oe chargeability, IN RE: Lawrence R. Mulligan and | -on Renee T. Mulligan, Debtors; Bruce K. Jalbert and ; ; ; Pamela D. Jalbert, v. Lawrence R. Mulligan, 577 * ; . BR. 6 (Bkrtcy. D. Conn. 2017); and the Appellant in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut and the Court of Appeals for the ; ; Second Circuit. , a RESPONDENTS ; ; e Bruce K. Jalbert and Pamela D. Jalbert were Plaintiffs in the Superior Court civil action; the , action before the Bankruptcy ; Court, and Appellees in the District Court for the ; : District of Connecticut and the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. iii LIST OF ALL PROCEEDINGS Bruce K. Jalbert et al. v. Lawrence R. Mulligan et al. Superior Court of Connecticut, ; ‘ Judicial District of Waterbury Case No. UWY CV-08-6001044-S Decision Date: June 11, 2013 (App.64a) Bruce K. Jalbert et al. v. Lawrence R. Mulligan et al. Court of Appeal of Connecticut Case No. AC 35824 . Decision Date: September 23, 2014 (App.41a) In re: Mulligan Lawrence R. Mulligan and Renee T. Mulligan United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Connecticut, New Haven Division Case No.: 10-50037 (AMN), Chapter 7 Adv. Pro. No. 10-05023 (AMN) ; Decision Date: October 27, 2017 (App.13a) , Lawrence R. Mulligan v. . Bruce K. Jalbert and Pamela D. Jalbert . United States District Court, Connecticut Case No. 3:17-cv-01873 (JAM) Decision Date: May 3, 2018 (App.9a) In re Lawrence R. Mulligan, Lawrence R. Mulligan v. ; Bruce K. Jalbert, Pamela Jalbert United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Case No. 18-1657 a : Decision Date: March 5, 2019 (App.1a) Date of Order Denying Motion for Rehearing and Rehearing en banc: April 15, 2019 (App.98a) ; : ; iv

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-02
Waiver of right of respondents Bruce Jalbert, et al. to respond filed.
2019-07-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 15, 2019)

Attorneys

Bruce Jalbert, et al.
John Michael WolfsonFeiner Wolfson LLC, Respondent
John Michael WolfsonFeiner Wolfson LLC, Respondent
Lawrence Mulligan
Lawrence Mulligan — Petitioner
Lawrence Mulligan — Petitioner