No. 19-84
Lawrence Mulligan v. Bruce Jalbert, et ux.
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights collateral-estoppel due-process full-faith-and-credit state-court-record summary-judgment
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the United States Circuit Court of Appeals erred when it affirmed the granting of Respondents' Motion for Summary Judgment based exclusively on collateral estoppel, which Motion lacked any reference to the State Court Record as required by the applicable law of the State of Connecticut, thereby failing to accord Full Faith and Credit to the law of that State, thus denying Petitioner Due Process of Law.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the United States Circuit Court of Appeals erred in affirming the granting of summary judgment based on collateral-estoppel without reference to the state-court-record as required by state-law, thereby failing to accord full-faith-and-credit and denying due-process
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-02
Waiver of right of respondents Bruce Jalbert, et al. to respond filed.
2019-07-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 15, 2019)
Attorneys
Bruce Jalbert, et al.
John Michael Wolfson — Feiner Wolfson LLC, Respondent
Lawrence Mulligan
Lawrence Mulligan — Petitioner