Whether the Court can exercise its encompassing jurisdiction to redress the imposition of a disproportionate amount of time added to a primary base term, as an enhanced penalty for a prior felony which is subsequently no longer considered a violent offense, or where all joint defendants are reduced to a non-violent crime as a result of the enactment of new law within the state

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Alou can the Court be impelfe of fo use (t5" alf encom passin Juris diction to rectress Lhe impos/ fron of a Trial Cour f issuing 4 Wspropor tionaze amount of time added fe a primary base ferm , 48 an 49970 Vafed enhancement of G prior Le lony which is Subseuen#|y No longer Cons iered 4 Violent of lense, or where a// J ont gees are reduced fo a non Vrolent crime as a resu/f of fhe enactment of New Law Within Hhe Stove ; Frop 8 pen ah New! rated ais ACCA , or New Case Law deciding The Cafegory of nenviolence for g Zn r Robbery by fhe USA Y OL ner Meng << peverse fhe Oeliberate Indifference or Jack of Tudicia / ore sigh i trom fhe lower Courts , Ve a erpestuating hscarage of Justice Caus/ne bolporedle Harm fe Mager Ths TrterestP