Whether the defendant had notice of the plaintiffs' assault, and whether the lack of such notice is sufficient to show that the plaintiffs' Eighth Amendment claims fail

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED DT withthe Cost Cold deride the issue /review ot Nelibaate woirttmnce of tne Bin amnendonerst, TN adder to demonstrate Hat the deSeudautt hod. Notice OTON extensive Tay OTC prsoKs assault, HY is sudticiest Thay Ahe Mak 15 LOA SNAG, PUSS, Lodll docurmmested , Or express ovedk \o EMSON officials IN the pastlasdcahne cindunatantes Suagest Abs Khe detendaustt ofcial. \oein NG) hadilocen exposed To information educensivg Tnerish, Coxv Quin a3 ESA 9AM, 2b (Atn UY 206 apenas Partich exvel. . Lee, Cevelan ee SA 2a4, 203 tn Civdooy, 2d» Neo Prisons ofGicials Jlorentains stocal_. GNOX Sacecerdn the Moxa Nhe musty — FEOA Bah Bon lbeXore_ Const io ON OLN, hak pk ‘prcoo ust OF SSK O& exceasive Narn 15 oe OSsaul ed.