No. 19-8411
Charles Burton v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure fifth-amendment harmless-error sixth-amendment structural-error
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment DueProcess HabeasCorpus
FifthAmendment DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-05-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether mailing a verdict to a criminal defendant through his counsel in violation of the Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment and Federal Criminal Rule of Procedure 43(a) constitutes structural error, and if so, whether harmless error review is the proper appellate standard
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether mailing a verdict to a criminal defendant through his counsel in violation of the Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment and Federal Criminal Rule of Procedure 43(a) constitutes structural error, and if so, whether harmless error review is the proper appellate standard. i
Docket Entries
2020-06-01
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.
2020-05-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-04-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 5, 2020)
Attorneys
Charles Burton
Steven Richard Jaeger — The Jaeger Firm PLLC, Petitioner
Steven Richard Jaeger — The Jaeger Firm PLLC, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent